Tucson Progressive

Pamela Powers Hannley, a progressive voice for Arizona

Come to ‘Drinking Liberally’ for a lively discussion of 2010 ballot propositions

Drinking Liberally Tucson Chapter

Sunday, October 10, the Tucson Chapter of Drinking Liberally will host a discussion on the ballot propositions– and thanks to the Arizona Legislature, there are lots of them. (You see, when they don’t want to make a tough decision or don’t want to be blamed for making a tough decision– like last spring’s sales tax increase “for schools”– they put an initiative on the ballot.)

As usual, many of the propositions have names that sound good but actually aren’t good for the people of Arizona. (No wonder people are upset with the political system in the US.) As a general rule of thumb, vote NO on all of the propositions with 100 and 300 numbers; these are the ones the Legislature put on the ballot. (Check out the links below to the Tucson Weekly are the Pima County Democratic Party endorsements for a more nuanced viewpoint.)

Three of the more heinous propositions are:
Prop 106, Arizona’s Health Care Freedom Act, allows Arizona voters to opt out of nationwide healthcare reform. Funded almost entirely by special interest groups from outside of Arizona, this is one of those propositions that sounds good but isn’t. Arizonans voted this proposition down before, but the backers have enough money to try again. Here is an except from their website:

Arizona’s Health Care Freedom Act disrupts this theft of liberty and makes real health care reform possible – by ensuring that any solution begins not with appeasing industry, but by listening to patients.

Let me go on the record as someone who would have preferred single-payer, universal healthcare (oooooo…spooky…socialism!) This quote sounds like that, but it isn’t. Basically, when they say “health care freedom” they mean “you’re on your own” and no one is going to bail you out. Remember Sicko? Healthcare reform saves money, covers more people, and eliminates pre-existing conditions. Vote NO on 106!

Prop 107, Arizona Civil Rights Initiative is another one that sounds good but isn’t and is another one funded by special interest groups from outside of Arizona. Proposition 107 is the brainchild of white supremisist Ward Connerly. It would prohibit all programs that offer women, girls, and people of color equal opportunity in education, business contracting, and employment. Supporters of this measure have been shopping it around to different states; it has passed in some and failed in others. Connerly, who is from California, put it on the ballot first there. Since it passed, diversity among California’s college students has dropped dramatically. Vote NO on 107!

Prop 302, Arizona First Things First Program Repeal is an attempt by the Arizona Legislature to steal more money from Arizona children. The First Things First Program benefits children and families and was created by a ballot initiative several years ago. It is fully funded by the tobacco tax. Since the Arizona Legislature refuses to make tough choices about Arizona’s eschewed tax system and wants to continue the trickle down economics welfare to the rich, they have to find money somewhere. Unfortunately, kids don’t vote, so they are a favorite target of the Arizona Legislature. Vote NO on 302 and keep one of the last pro-children programs left in Arizona.

The Tucson Weekly and the Pima County Democratic Party have issued their ballot endorsements. (Click on these links to find them.) For the most part, they agree, but the Weekly votes no on the city charter changes (Prop 401), and the Dems changed their minds last week and are now endorsing it.

Mike Bryan, of Blog for Arizona fame, will lead the Drinking Liberally discussion on the propositions.

Drinking Liberally is a nationwide organization of progressive thinkers. Although their slogan is “Improving democracy one pint at a time,” wine-drinkers and non-drinkers are welcome. Be prepared for wide-ranging discussions on the left side of the political spectrum.

Tucson’s Drinking Liberally meets religiously every Sunday evening on the patio at The Shanty, at the corner of 4th Ave. and 9th St. Open discussions begin at 6 p.m.; speakers usually start at 7 p.m. I personally prefer Drinking Liberally Classic, when there is no speaker.

8 comments on “Come to ‘Drinking Liberally’ for a lively discussion of 2010 ballot propositions

  1. Carolyn Classen
    October 9, 2010

    Watch the KUAT online video about Prop. 401: Tom Prezelski (no) and Jeff Rogers (yes):
    http://ondemand.azpm.org/videoshorts/watch/2010/10/8/1356-tucson-charter-change-debate/

    Thanks Pam for posting this about Drinking Liberally.

    • Pamela Powers
      October 9, 2010

      Thanks for the link to the debate.  We missed it on TV.
      Do you and your husband come to DL? We go randomly but will probably go tomorrow. I think DL should have a seat on the Democratic Party Executive Committee– like the other clubs (Dems of Greater Tucson, Nucleus Club, and others). DL is a more progressive group, and the Dems need to hear our ideas.

  2. Three Sonorans
    October 9, 2010

    I’ve been having debates on 401 lately… the argument is “The Dems have supported it, so it must be ok!”
     
    Ugghhh!

    • Pamela Powers
      October 9, 2010

      Ugh, indeed. That’s why I’m glad that the Tucson Weekly said NO to 401.

  3. Carolyn Classen
    October 11, 2010

    Pamela, did you attend this DL event?  Who spoke in favor of Prop. 401?

    • Pamela Powers
      October 11, 2010

      Yes, Jim and I attended. Although Props 400 and 401 were on the handout, they were not discusses last night.
       
      Next week at DL, Prop 401 paid lobbyist Katie Bolger will discuss 400 and 401. Expect the Protect Local Control folks to be there.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

About

The Tucson Progressive: Pamela Powers Hannley

I stand on the side of Love. I believe in kindness to all creatures on Earth and the inherent self-worth of all individuals--not just people who agree with me or look like me.

Widespread economic and social injustice prompted me to become a candidate for the Arizona House, representing Legislative District 9 in the 2016 election. My platform focuses on economic reforms to grow Arizona's economy, establish a state-based public bank, fix our infrastructure, fully fund public education, growlocal small businesses and community banks, and put people back to work at good-paying jobs. I also stand for equal rights, choice, and paycheck fairness for women. I am running as a progressive and running clean.

My day job is managing editor for the American Journal of Medicine, an academic medicine journal with a worldwide circulation. In addition, my husband and I co-direct Arizonans for a New Economy, Arizona's public banking initiative. I am a member of the national board of the Public Banking Institute, and I am co-chair of the Arizona Democratic Progressive Caucus, the largest caucus of the Arizona Democratic Party.

I am a published author, photographer, videographer, clay artist, mother, nana, and wife. I have a bachelor's degree in journalism from Ohio State University and a masters in public health from the University of Arizona. I grew up in Amherst, Ohio, but I have lived in Tucson, Arizona since 1981. I am a proud member of the Unitarian Universalist Church of Tucson and the Public Relations Society of America.

My Tucson Progressive blog and Facebook page feature large doses of liberal ideas, local, state, and national politics, and random bits of humor. I also blog at Blog for Arizona and the Huffington Post.

Follow Me on Twitter

Follow Tucson Progressive on WordPress.com

Follow Me on Instagram

There was an error retrieving images from Instagram. An attempt will be remade in a few minutes.

%d bloggers like this: