Tucson Progressive

Pamela Powers Hannley, a progressive voice for Arizona

Flip-flopper McCain shows his homophobia and his age on DADT

Arizona Senator John McCain

“Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” (DADT)– the weird US military policy that says gays and Lesbians can serve in the military as long as no one can tell they’re gay– has been in existence since the early 1990s. Repeal of DADT has popped up on the Congressional radar and on the campaign trail many times.

Presidential candidate John McCain said he would be in favor of repealing DADT– if the military brass approved. In the spring of 2010, General David Petraeus told the Senate Armed Services Committee that “the time has come” to allow gays to serve openly in the military. But that wasn’t enough for McCain. In fact, he wouldn’t allow Patraeus to read his 8-minute prepared statement on DADT– obviously because he didn’t want to hear it.

In the summer of 2010, General Collin Powell said he had changed his position on DADT and now favors repeal. But that wasn’t enough for McCain– even though he had said he was waiting to hear Powell’s opinion.

McCain called for a survey of enlisted men on the subject of DADT. Recently, the results of that survey were released. It revealed that 70 percent of enlisted men and women think it would be no big deal to allow gays and Lesbians to serve openly in the military. Among combat Marine and Army combat troops, nearly 60 percent “said they thought repealing the law would hurt their units’ ability to fight on the battlefield,” according to an Associated Press story in the Arizona Daily Star.

Now McCain say the survey– that he called for– was flawed.

More details from the Star

McCain seized on this finding to argue that forcing such a substantial personnel policy change in a time of war would be wrong for the military and the country. He also criticized the study for scrutinizing only how the law could be repealed, instead of whether doing so would benefit the military.

“At this time, we should be inherently cautious about making any changes that would affect our military, and what changes we do make should be the product of careful and deliberate consideration,” McCain said.

McCain’s statement was directly challenged by Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Adm. Mike Mullen, the military’s top uniformed officer who chairs the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

“Repeal of the law will not prove unacceptable risk to military readiness,” Mullen told the Senate Armed Services Committee. “Unit cohesion will not suffer if our units are well-led. And families will not encourage their loved ones to leave the service in droves.”

Mullen also said that Congress should act before the courts do, and that wartime is an ideal time for repeal.

“War does not stifle change; it demands it,” he said. “It does not make it harder; it facilitates it.”
McCain has previously suggested that Mullen’s opinion didn’t matter as much as other military commanders because he doesn’t directly lead troops.

In his opening statement, Mullen seemed to issue a direct challenge to McCain.
“For more than 40 years, I have made decisions that affected and even risked the lives of young men and women,” Mullen said. “You do not have to agree with me on this issue. But don’t think for one moment that I haven’t carefully considered the impact of the advice I give on those who will have to live with the decisions that advice informs.”

Marine Gen. James Cartwright, the No. 2 officer on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said in an interview that if Congress fails to act the military could handle an abrupt about-face mandated by the courts.
He like the other Pentagon leaders said that is by far the second choice, and would be disruptive for forces currently cycling through the military’s tightly planned rotation for wartime deployment.

“Bringing this into force quickly means that we have to do some of this in the battlefield. Probably doable, but it’s a bigger challenge than we really want to have to take,” Cartwright said.
Cartwright and the military chiefs of each service will testify before the same Senate panel on Friday. The focus will be on Marine Commandant Gen. James Amos because of the survey results showing high opposition to repeal among Marine combat troops.

“I cannot speak for him but I will speak as a Marine,” Cartwright said. “If the law is repealed the Marine Corps will lead the education, training, and bringing it in,” he said. “They will comply with the law, no doubt about it, and they will comply with the law aggressively.”

For more coverage on DADT and McCain’s flip-flopping, check out this link to The Daily Show’s archive. Particularly telling is The Daily Show’s clip from December 2– which provides some of the very specific questions that were asked (even the shower question).

Considering McCain’s long history of flip-flopping on DADT, I think it is obvious that his opinion on the issue– and other difficult questions– twists in the wind and depends upon the polls. I also think McCain is showing his age and his homophobia.

9 comments on “Flip-flopper McCain shows his homophobia and his age on DADT

  1. andrew farley
    December 3, 2010

    I hope Pamela knows that “the Daily Show” is a comedy, right?

    • Pamela Powers
      December 3, 2010

      Yes, the Daily Show and the Colbert Report are political parody, but you must admit that these shows + the bloggers voice opinions that you would never hear from the corporate media. Check out the multiple video clips where McCain’s flip-flopping is revealed in his own words.

  2. medicareblogger
    December 3, 2010

    McCain’s not a flip-flopper.  He’s a liar.  He lied about his position on DADT to appear more acceptable to younger voters.  He’s lied about lots of things to create his “maverick” image.  It was all smoke and mirrors with McCain.  The only time he was completely truthful was when he sang his little ditty, “Bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb Iran”.  He said that was a joke, but that’s what he’d love to do.  Thank god he could not hide his true personality  personality during the campaign – that of cranky old man – or we’d be in a third war by now.

    • Pamela Powers
      December 3, 2010

      Don’t hold back, now…
       
      President McCain would have offered more tax cuts + more war to get out of the budget problems– instead of extending unemployment, shipping money to the states to forestall job cuts, and funding public works projects, as President Obama has done.

  3. tiponeill
    December 3, 2010

    Three Sonorans must be pleased.

    • Pamela Powers
      December 3, 2010

      Not sure what you mean by this.

      • tiponeill
        December 4, 2010

        I mean that he campaigned hard to get McCain re-elected.

  4. Pamela Powers
    December 3, 2010

    His homophobia makes me wonder what might have happened to him in military school.

  5. Trek
    December 4, 2010

    John M. is gay. The ones who fight the hardest to deny gay rights are the ones who live in fear. Having said that,  what is John afraid of? My guess is he has had a gay experience,  it’s sad he didn’t enjoy it. Now all others have to continue to suffer because he is scared. WTF, what does it take to catch him with his pants down.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Information

This entry was posted on December 3, 2010 by in Arizona, Congress, John McCain and tagged , .

About

The Tucson Progressive: Pamela Powers Hannley

I stand on the side of Love. I believe in kindness to all creatures on Earth and the inherent self-worth of all individuals--not just people who agree with me or look like me.

Widespread economic and social injustice prompted me to become a candidate for the Arizona House, representing Legislative District 9 in the 2016 election. My platform focuses on economic reforms to grow Arizona's economy, establish a state-based public bank, fix our infrastructure, fully fund public education, growlocal small businesses and community banks, and put people back to work at good-paying jobs. I also stand for equal rights, choice, and paycheck fairness for women. I am running as a progressive and running clean.

My day job is managing editor for the American Journal of Medicine, an academic medicine journal with a worldwide circulation. In addition, my husband and I co-direct Arizonans for a New Economy, Arizona's public banking initiative. I am a member of the national board of the Public Banking Institute, and I am co-chair of the Arizona Democratic Progressive Caucus, the largest caucus of the Arizona Democratic Party.

I am a published author, photographer, videographer, clay artist, mother, nana, and wife. I have a bachelor's degree in journalism from Ohio State University and a masters in public health from the University of Arizona. I grew up in Amherst, Ohio, but I have lived in Tucson, Arizona since 1981. I am a proud member of the Unitarian Universalist Church of Tucson and the Public Relations Society of America.

My Tucson Progressive blog and Facebook page feature large doses of liberal ideas, local, state, and national politics, and random bits of humor. I also blog at Blog for Arizona and the Huffington Post.

Follow Me on Twitter

Follow Tucson Progressive on WordPress.com

Follow Me on Instagram

There was an error retrieving images from Instagram. An attempt will be remade in a few minutes.

%d bloggers like this: