Pamela Powers Hannley, a progressive voice for Arizona
#RedForEd lifted the veil from our eyes and put the issue of corporate tax giveaways front and center in the fight to restore public education funding in Arizona.
As many of you are aware, the Arizona Legislature is giving away more than $13 billion in taxes every year and using only $10 billion to run the state. It is not sound fiscal policy to use accounting gimmicks and 50 fund transfers to “balance” the budget. It is no surprise that the state owes K-12 education around $1 billion. Thanks to scheduled corporate tax cuts passed by the Tea Party*, beginning in 2011, Arizona’s corporations got to keep an extra $1 billion in 2017. These corporate tax cuts continue through 2019, even though we can’t afford them.
As a result of the anger and frustration that many Tucsonans feel about the Arizona Legislature’s performance, the Stop Thief! Let’s Restore Fair Taxes Community Forum drew a standing room only crowd of diverse participants. The event was hosted by the Pima Area Labor Federation (PALF) and Progressive Democrats of America (PDA Tucson), with support from many other unions and community groups.
Heart-felt testimonies from current high school students, who explained how school budget cuts have impacted their lives and their schools, opened the forum.
LD9 Rep. Randy Friese gave a detailed presentation on tax revenue and how it has been siphoned off by special interest groups and corporate tax cuts for decades. (Video after the jump.)
My talk focused on specific tax giveaway votes in the 53rd Legislature. focused specific tax giveaway bills and the drama that swirled around the bills that passed and the ones that failed. (Video after the jump.) Excluding any votes related to budget appropriations, all of the tax giveaway votes in the 53rd Legislature were bipartisan— with Democrats and Republicans on both sides.
The Legislature’s mindset on tax giveaways shifted from January 2017– when two Progressive Democrats made a pact to vote against every tax giveaway until the schools were fully funded– to budget night in May 2018. The Progressive viewpoint was: If the state “can’t afford” to fully fund K-12 public education (due to self-imposed austerity), then we “can’t afford” to give away or excuse any more taxes until the schools are on stable footing and fully funded. Thanks to the #RedForEd movement, on budget night 2018, hundreds of teachers, parents, and supporters filled the House gallery and the Capitol lawn and demanded that public education take priority over corporate tax cuts.
As I mentioned in my talk, a thorough tax giveaway review bill and several tax reform or repeal bills were proposed in the Legislature in 2018. Unfortunately, due to the gamesmanship at the Capitol, these bills were not heard because they were proposed by Democrats: Senator Steve Farley and Reps. Mark Cardenas, Randy Friese, and Pamela Powers Hannley.
It’s time to review all of the tax cuts, tax exemptions, tax credits, tax subtractions, and other tax loopholes. Some of these tax giveaways benefit narrow interests– to the detriment of the general fund and the general public. We must determine which tax exemptions benefit the people of Arizona (like the TPT exemptions for food and prescription drugs); which ones benefit special interest groups (like gold bullion enthusiasts); which ones benefit individual corporations (like the infamous four-inch pipe); which ones we are effective and affordable; and how we can spark economic development without breaking our budget and starving all of our educational institutions, as we are now.
Several people told me that they felt hopeful after my talk because so many costly tax giveaways were stopped on a bipartisan vote. If fact, all of the tax giveaway votes were bipartisan— with Democrats and Republicans on both sides. This is why it is important to ask every candidate in the 2018 election what their stance is on tax giveaways, the #RedForEd movement, the Invest In Ed Citizens Initiative (to secure long-term funding for K-12), and the Outlaw Dirty Money Citizens Initiative. Will these candidates fight for the people or will they “take the money and run”?
A few people have told me that I shouldn’t go to the Legislature and just vote “no.” My goal in the Legislature is to work for and fight for the people of Arizona. In a Legislature that is controlled by right-wing ideology, that often translates into trying to stop bad bills from becoming law. In the 53rd Legislature, being the voice of the people meant fighting against corporate tax giveaways, stingy TANF benefits, English-only insurance contracts, risky pension fund investments, untested technologies, diminished workers compensation benefits and workers rights, financial deregulation, misleading insurance contracts, environmental degradation, bad water policy, increased debt, increased sales tax, and more. Thankfully, there were many others– often on both sides of the aisle– who disagreed with these bad bills and also voted “no” to stop them.
A reporter recently told me that, historically, Democrats in the minority make deals with Republicans and vote for Republican bills in exchange for votes on their bills. I have seen this vote-trading up close and personal in the Arizona House. I have been lobbied by other Democrats to vote for bills I disagree with– like the bill that would have classified home health workers as not real employees. A Democrat asked me why I was voting “no”. First of all, this bill conflicted with federal law and could get us sued. (It’s a total waste of money to pass laws that will cost us millions in court battles.) Other than that, why would we vote for a bill that diminishes the rights of workers, who are already underpaid and who suffer from wage theft? The only reason I can see for classifying these workers as “not employees” is to further screw them on wages, benefits and travel time from one home to another. Trying hard to get me to change my vote, this Democratsaid, “They’re just leased employees”– as if that status makes them less deserving of worker protections.
I look at every bill and ask, “How will this benefit the people of Arizona?” I don’t look at the bills and ask, “Will a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’ vote please my big donors?” Or, “What position will boost my political career?”
When you stand up for the people, and you use your debate skills and tough questionsto change minds and votes, that’s a good thing. Going bold and arguing against bills that are morally wrong is more important than groveling for Republican favor by giving away your votes in exchange for the opportunity to pass a small-scale, safe bill that the GOP doesn’t care about (or wants to use as a striker later). In the 53rd Legislature, there were times when “reaching across the aisle” actually meant voting “no” on Republican bills.
As Legislators, our goal should be improving the lives of all Arizonans– not featherbedding corporations and special interest groups.
Here are the two videos from the Stop Thief! tax forum. Dr. Friese’s talk sets the stage on revenue. My talk focuses on specific tax giveaway bills, including which bills passed and which ones died.
A few Slides
Here are a few of the slides showing the bipartisan votes on the corporate tax giveaway bills.
Cross-posted from PowersForThePeople.net.